You're doing it rrrong
Feb. 28th, 2010 11:35 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I check up the winter Olympics medal count and what do I see?
Naaaah, nice trick, but I'm afraid you're doing it rrrong. That's not how the medal count is done. Or maybe in this case it is, since it's more convenient? Maybe the way the medal count is done varies, depending on whether you have the most medals in general, or the most gold medals. Eh?
As far as I know (and the IOC seems to agree with me), the medal count is done this way:
Ah. Now it's better.
Nice try, though. A lot of people might have even bought it, I'll give you that ;-)
1. | ![]() | United States | 9 | 14 | 13 | 36 |
2. | ![]() | Germany | 10 | 12 | 7 | 29 |
3. | ![]() | Canada | 13 | 7 | 5 | 25 |
Naaaah, nice trick, but I'm afraid you're doing it rrrong. That's not how the medal count is done. Or maybe in this case it is, since it's more convenient? Maybe the way the medal count is done varies, depending on whether you have the most medals in general, or the most gold medals. Eh?
As far as I know (and the IOC seems to agree with me), the medal count is done this way:
1. | ![]() | Canada | 13 | 7 | 5 | 25 |
2. | ![]() | Germany | 10 | 12 | 7 | 29 |
3. | ![]() | United States | 9 | 14 | 13 | 36 |
Ah. Now it's better.
Nice try, though. A lot of people might have even bought it, I'll give you that ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-28 10:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-28 10:39 pm (UTC)