No, I am not irritated at all =) I used the 'official' sounding vocabulary only because I didn't seem to have made myself clear the first time with exactly what I was asking for your thoughts on. Perhaps I overcompensated the second time, hope you understand it's a tough choice sometimes - between sounding officious and being unclear. You probably presumed that I am irritated because I am religious and can naturally be expected to be irritated when someone says something critical of religion. I assure you this is not the case - religious people do not as a rule get irritated when religion is criticized, and you don't have to worry about it being a sensitive topic for me. The "officiousness" is only to avoid misunderstanding. In fact if you look at my comments in the other threads in this post, you'll see that I never lost objectivity even when proving the provocative intent of the other person's comments directed at me, and my objections were never to frankness but to the surfeit of inconsistencies.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-05 09:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-05 09:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-05 09:49 pm (UTC)