mahnmut: (An understanding has been reached.)
[personal profile] mahnmut
...the facts start piling up. This time I'll leave the readers do their own conclusions.

But first, a little introduction:

Analysis: Is Gaza blockade a legitimate tool of war?
http://www.jpost.com/Home/Article.aspx?id=91645

And now, the facts.

VIDEO: IDF Soldier Beaten Mercilessly with Iron Bars by Turkish Flotilla Thugs
http://undhimmi.com/2010/05/31/video-idf-soldier-beaten-mercilessly-with-iron-bars-by-turkish-flotilla-thugs/

Turkish Funds Helped Group Test Blockade
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/02/world/middleeast/02activists.html?ref=middleeast

Who was funding the Gaza flotilla?
http://wizbangblog.com/content/2010/06/01/who-was-funding-the-gaza-flotilla.php

Turkish Flotilla Organisers Linked to Terror Funding
http://undhimmi.com/2010/06/01/turkish-flotilla-organisers-linked-to-terror-funding/

Turkish (blood)bath: Ankara ambushes Israel at sea
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/turkish_blood_bath_Jean7yjj5Salz75brRSsMJ

Turkish ship sailed Islamic terrorists ready to kill Jews
http://ivarfjeld.wordpress.com/2010/06/02/turkish-ship-sailed-islamic-terrorists-ready-to-kill-jews/

Turkish provocation and Arabic lives
http://times.am/2010/05/31/turkish-provocation-and-arabic-lives/

A brutal ambush at sea
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3896796,00.html

The Terror Finance Flotilla: The convoy of ships allegedly trying to bring aid to the Gaza Strip was organized by a group belonging to an officially designated terrorist organization.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/terror-finance-flotilla

And finally, let's just mention that there's a new flotilla in the making as we speak:

International campaign preparing new aid flotilla to Gaza
http://ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=25047

Any predictions how this one will develop?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Thanks. I'll read through it after I get back from my second job interview (I'm in the final 2!) and give my first actual opinion on the subject.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Gee, I'm crossing my fingers for you!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
(Can't you just, ehm, kill the other guy or something?)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Ha. I joked that to my dad yesterday and he said I shouldn't say such things, because then something will happen to him and you know who everyone will look for.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
That could only mean that your dad is a secret FBI informant.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
Um, I just had a read through, and I don't think I'd trust half of these sources. None of them seem neutral, several are conspiracy theorist and a couple, particularly the second and the seventh, seem to be in cloud cuckoo land.

I'd stick to the BBC and main news organisations, personally.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
What, you don't care about ""independent"" sources? (double quotation marks)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
Sorry? I don't get the meaning of the double quotations. I was just saying I'd stick to stuff that was at least trying to remain impartial and report the facts.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 07:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Show me a guideline defining the criteria for impartiality.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
We;ll, it's a nice start if to begin with every side is accusing the news source of being biased against the other guy. The BBC is particular has been accused of being left-wing, right-wing, pro-palestinian, pro Israel, all usually at the same time.
Then, it is usually good if they do not make it blatently obvious what side they are on in putting forwards opinions as well as facts. Those which appear to eb sticking to the facts and not pushing any agenda are best.

Finally, I wound not trust any site which seems to be founded on conspiracy theories, which at least two of your sources seem to be.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
So you want them not to state their biases but instead follow them silently, while still holding biases. That's called political correctness.

Fact: you'll probably never find a completely impartial media.

I already understood that you would not trust part of the sources. Frankly, I seldom trust any sources.

Maybe you should read my previous post too.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
That still leaves you with the other half.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 09:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
You: and I don't think I'd trust half of these sources

Me: That still leaves you with the other half.


Which means you trust half of these sources. That would suffice, I guess. The point being that you may selectively pick up one or more sources, declare them unreliable, and thus dismiss the entire point. -or- You could skip those sources which you don't trust, and focus on the point, based on those which you do trust.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
I don't trust half the sources, and don't know enough about the other half to be able to make a balanced judgement. They may have a point, this is true, but then the crazy man in palimant sqaure holding boards saying the freemasons did 9/11 might have a point about Global Warning, but I'd rather trust the scientists.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hannahsarah.livejournal.com
I'm seriously considering moving to Israel, and while I was filling out my application through Nefesh b'Nefesh, the website got hacked and shut down.

You see, THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!!!

I'm not such a huge fan of the Israeli government at times, but when the sh*t hits the fan (and it will) I'd rather be in The Land than out of it.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
That's brave. You want to be in the place while the shit spills over it?

Also, it's time we accept the fact that whenever a conflict occurs, it'll be accompanied by cyber warfare. It has happened when Russians hacked Estonian internet, then Georgian internet, the Chinese hackers have been very active, and the Turks now.

The upside of all that is that it's a source of more lulz. Unless you're directly affected of course. Sorry to hear that you were affected.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hannahsarah.livejournal.com
The shit will not be confined to Israel's borders, I assure you. I felt much safer when I was in Israel than I do here in the US. The anti Israel demonstrations around the US and Europe are getting more out of hand every day.

People are coming out of the woodwork saying all kinds of horrible things, with no shame whatsoever. If they had said things like that about an African American there would be riots and blood in the streets - but of course we're expected to be as meek as lambs.

Things have not been OK here for a very long time, but this past week has really driven home to me that this is NOT where I am supposed to be. It can take up to a year to immigrate, so in the meantime I'm keeping the hatches battened down, and the safety off.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Being at a demonstration could be dangerous, yes. But I doubt you'd attend an anti-Israel demonstration so I should feel safe for your security while in the US. ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alphistia.livejournal.com
oh my, putting a piece by Ralph Peters from the NY Post on this reading list pretty much sends me a bit further into the Turkish camp on this issue...

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
At least it wasn't Alex Jones. Oh snap! :-D

I think ddstory is up to something over there.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Good thing you didnt cite David Icke as well :D

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 10:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Oh I get it. It's the source, Watson.

OK then here's something I know you'd appreciate.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-june-3-2010/glenn-beck-airs-israeli-raid-footage

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 11:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
No opinion yet

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/jun/04/press-freedom-israel

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
So far what I see mostly is people posting semi-related "facts" to back up the positions they already came to before any evidence. I'm trying not to jump to the opposite side just out of association, but it's hard.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-04 11:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Always is.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
Veteran of the web as you are, I'm a bit disappointed that you seem to fail to realize when people say "you can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts", mean exactly that; since if your facts differ from mine, your sources are unreliable.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 07:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Fair enough. We all play the same game.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 06:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com
Thanks for the perspective. What angers me is how so many are blindly one-sided on this incident (and on the entire Middle Eastern crisis in general I suppose). This wasn't just some hippies taking flowers to Hamas.

Don't get me wrong, I'm pissed at Israel too but I guess this incident shows that people are going to believe what they choose to believe.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-05 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
That's what I've been trying to portray for the last 2 days. For the record, I'd like Israel to lift the blockade immediately. But that's not the way to do it. And my focus is of course on people's bias (while acknowledging my own as well).

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-06 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
Why is it not the way to do it? The flotilla made the blockade the global #1 news story for almost a week now. International pressure is building against Israel and if they continue with their current attitude, it's going to hurt them a lot. Seems to me like these actions were an absolute success.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-06 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Technically, yes indeed. Confrontation worked to down apartheid. The downside being that many people died in the process. How many people would you like to sacrifice now, and does it matter to you if they're not Americans or Europeans?
Page generated May. 10th, 2026 09:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios